Hillary Clinton’s India Visit

During the highly important recent visit to India by US State Secretary Hillary Clinton, the United States and India have expressed the resolve for promotion of cooperation in civil nuclear technology and defense sectors along with others departments also. Hillary Clinton has said that they will not tolerate the sanctuaries for the terrorists at all. Pakistan should take full-scale action against terrorism for the sake of stability in the region and that it should share intelligence information. It is necessary for the future of Pakistan itself.
India-Pakistan Dialogues
The US and Indian foreign ministers expressed these views while addressing a joint news conference at the conclusion of strategic dialogues. On this occasion, both the countries agreed to expand cooperation for curbing terrorism and to expedite the process of implementation of the civilian nuclear agreement. The strategic dialogues also discussed the Pakistan-India dialogues and they urged that Pakistan should destroy the safe havens of the terrorists for stability in the region and for security of its future. Clinton said that civil nuclear agreement is a ''vital investment'' between both the countries. For this purpose, the United States will keep cooperating with India.
Clinton assured the Indian officials that the Barack Obama administration will keep the pressure up against Pakistan to handle the extremists and that they will not allow Taliban to regain power in Afghanistan after the withdrawal of US military. She said that Pakistan-India talks are welcome development. The United States wants to see confidence restored between both the countries and for this purpose the settled measures should be properly acted upon.
War on Terror
She reiterated that the United States considers Pakistan an important ally in the war on terror. She confessed that the number of people who died in terrorists' attacks are far more than the people in the United States. However, Pakistan should secure its areas and its people. We want long term relations with Pakistan under the bilateral interests however we will not tolerate the safe hideouts of terrorists in any part of the world and we will have to work jointly in order to remove them. It is correct that no government can offer shelter to a terrorist since it is aware of the mortal consequences.
She said that it is in the interest of Pakistan' future to improve ties with India. She also said that we want to see justice done to the people who attacked India. The United States is committed to the agreement for civil nuclear technology and it will honor the agreement.
Expressing condolences and sympathies with the victims of Mumbai blasts, US State Secretary Hillary Clinton said that Indian war against terrorism is ''our war''. We will always side with India on this issue. Pakistan has also fallen prey to the terrorism. On this occasion, both the countries reached an agreement for the cyber security as well. Under the agreement, Indian secret agency -- Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and the US CIA will provide intelligence information to each other in case of any incident of terrorism.
Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna said during the talks with US State Secretary Hillary Clinton, we have talked about the permanent membership of India in the UN Security Council and to expand the role of India in Afghanistan. Krishna said at the time of military drawdown from Afghanistan, the United States should keep the ground realities in view and ''ensure'' that following the withdrawal, the Taliban-led terrorists do regroup and strengthen themselves. We have made it clear to the other allied countries, including the United States, that their presence is highly necessary in Afghanistan.
US Withdrawal From Afghanistan
US State Secretary Clinton said I want to make it clear that though the United States has initiated the process of pulling out its troops from Afghanistan but it does not mean we are completely leaving the region. We are committed to performing our duties in the region. She said that in order to give the reconciliation a practical shape and to maintain it, the United States would need the cooperation of all the neighboring countries of Afghanistan, including India and Pakistan. India has recently shifted its stance after a longtime opposition to talks with the Taliban.
Referring to India's stance, US State Secretary Clinton said that India has expressed its ''concerns'' about foreign intervention during the process of reconciliation. We agree to these concerns and we are holding talks with India over these issues. We also believe that Pakistan's role in also very important in this process and Pakistan has ''fair interests'' which should be safeguarded. A democratic, stable and prosperous Pakistan is necessary for the durable peace and security in the region. The drawdown in the forces does not signify that we are leaving Afghanistan alone.
US State Secretary Hillary Clinton urged India that now it is the right time when India should play its leadership role in the Asia where China is spreading its influence and power. She said that India should help the neighboring countries Pakistan and Afghanistan that are suffering numerous difficulties. India should expand its political influence as it has its economic influence and power. Moreover, Washington is ''aware of the fact'' that India has the capability to do so as compared to China. The 21st century is the time to find new opportunities and playing leadership role. She said the United States and India share common vision with regard to the future of the region. US State Secretary Clinton said that Indian leadership has all kinds of abilities to positively shape the future of Asia Pacific region and in this process, we encourage India that it not only should look toward east but also engage itself in the east as well.
Evolution of Economic, Historical and Scientific Process
The statement of US State Secretary Hillary Clinton in India where she said, ''I want to make it clear that the United States is going to start the process of drawdown of its troops from Afghanistan but it does not mean that we are going to leave this region'' is no less than a tragedy for the terrorists and their patrons. The terrorists are jumping with joy that they will once again regain the control of the region after the US withdrawal from this region and again they will be able to do what they please with. Moreover, the 'West's' agenda in this region with regard to the terrorism and the terrorists will not change because of the US economy coming to the state of default. It is notable that now India is also part of west besides China and Russia. However, no matter they are the US allies or Russia or China, no wants to see the United States going bankrupt because in that case, these advanced countries will lose lots of their assets in the United States. It will result into anarchy as a result to which the religious fanatics and terrorists will take over the control of the entire world.
Impact of US Economic Collapse
To be a superpower and then come up the expectations of this responsible level is no joke because it all takes place as a result of a long evolution of economic, historical and scientific process.
As a result of the collapse of the US economy, the world will confront various crises of serious nature including economically and militarily and no one will be immune from the mortal and lethal repercussions of the US economic collapse. Therefore, all these countries including the advanced countries will make every possible effort that things do not go this way because to successfully discharge the duties of a superpower is not possible for anyone including the US allies, and Russia or China, at the moment.

Indian Nuclear Installations, Reserves Highly Insecure

Recently, India and France signed a nuclear deal, under which France would provide two nuclear plants to India. The increasing Indian nuclear tendency raises several significant questions regarding security of the nuclear program. India has always been censuring Pakistani nuclear program so as to divert the global attention from the threats posed by its own nuclear program.

All Indian nuclear installations are situated in the eastern part of the country, where several separatist movements, including naxalites (Maoist guerrillas), are on their zenith. Similarly the Indian missile installations are situated either in the areas affected by naxalites or in those areas where Hindu extremists are active. Neither is the Indian Government's writ established nor is the Indian law enforced in 90 percent of these areas. The area has, rather become a no-go zone for the Indian Government.

Grim Situation
Koteshwar Rao, a Maoist leader, has recently claimed that they would get independence before 2050. If the naxalites can stop the Indian security forces from coming in any area, they can also blackmail the entire world by occupying the nuclear installations and material. According to the Indian Government sources, Uranium Processing Plant, Uranium Corporation of India Limited, Tiljer Heavy Water Plant, and Institute of Physics Jharkand are situated in the area where naxalites have complete control and their activities are at a premium.

Most of the Indian missiles installations are in Chandigarh, where the Sikh separatists, under the banner of Babar Khalsa are running an independence movement. Similarly, the reserves of Prithvi ballistic missiles are in the disputed valley of Jammu and Kashmir.

Ajit Dowel, former director of the IB [Intelligence Bureau], says that there are strong possibilities that naxalites direct their attention to illegal trade of uranium in order to enhance their resources. There are several people in the circles of the Indian nuclear scientists who are sympathetic to the naxalites, and provide covert support to the naxalites in using and illegal trade of Uranium. M. Mahalingam, scientist at Kaiga Nuclear Power Plant Karnataka, was one of them. Mahalingam mysteriously disappeared in June 2009, and his body was found in a pond a few days later.

It was presumed that he had committed suicide. In fact, RAW (Research and Analysis Wing), the Indian intelligence agency, had arrested Mahalingam for suspected links with the naxalites. However, he died as a result of the third degree torture during interrogation.
Illegal Trade of Nuclear Material
India has made no special security arrangements for its nuclear installations. Therefore, its installations meet accidents every now and then. The incident at Kaiga Nuclear Power Plant is one of these. In this incident, 90 officials fell ill as a result of drinking radiated water. In the nuclear installations throughout the country, 134 untoward incidents occurred during the 1990s. The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board claimed in 1998 that 28 incidents had occurred in nine power stations. However, none of these incidents was of a serious nature.

Nevertheless, the fact is that plants were shut because of fire eruption in five of these incidents. In one of the incidents, a scientist died when poisonous gas spread in a heavy water plant. Atomic pilfering, smuggling of nuclear fuel and mysterious deaths of scientists have become a regular feature of Indian nuclear plants and installations.

The Mumbai police arrested three people with large quantities of uranium on 7 December 2009. Similarly, the Bihar police arrested a group of smugglers near the Nepal's border on 19 February 2008. The police recovered 4-kg of uranium from their custody. The West Bengal police arrested two people and recovered more than 200 gm of semiprocessed uranium on 27 August 2001. The Mumbai police recovered 8.3-kg of uranium on 1 May 2000.

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the police arrested eight people on charges of involvement in illegal trade of nuclear material on 13 November 2008. Three uranium rods were also recovered from their custody. According to the IAEA sources, the Indian police recovered 57 pounds of uranium on 7 November 2000, and arrested two people for illegal trade of nuclear material.

All these incidents prove that Indian Nuclear Energy Commission does not have complete control over nuclear material. Moreover, its monitoring system is also quite deficient. As far as smuggling of nuclear material and the relevant resources is concerned, India is not behind any country. According to the CNN report of 26 January 2003, NEC (Naranjo Engineering Consultants) engineers, an Indian company, sent 10 consignments to Iraq, including very sensitive tools for the nuclear plant. Indian nuclear installations are threatened by the terrorists as well.

Security Measures
Fire erupted mysteriously in Bhabha Atomic Research Center on 29 December 2009. Later investigations proved that goons from the racket of Chhota Rajan, a Mumbai underworld don, had set it ablaze in collaboration with some less known serving as well as expelled police officials. Such incidents cast further doubts regarding the Indian nuclear program and nuclear installations. These incidents also raise questions as to how the United States and the Western countries can sign deals with India, in spite of such security arrangements of nuclear program.

These incidents are slap on the face of the Western media persons and governments. These incidents prove that Indian nuclear installations and reserves, rather the entire infrastructure, is highly insecure, and possibilities that extremists might gain access to it are far greater as compared to that of Pakistani nuclear infrastructure. India cannot boast the security measures of its nuclear program and its insecurity is a food for thought for the IAEA and also for the entire world.

US, India, Israeli Sign Accord for Opening of Joint Offices

The US, Indian, and Israeli Governments have signed an agreement to set up joint intelligence offices. The agreement was inked at the Hyderabad House in New Delhi.

Strengthening International Intelligence
Meanwhile, the interior, external, and defense ministries of the Indian Government has given directions to the concerned intelligence authorities to bolster contacts with the US and Israeli intelligence agencies as part of efforts aimed at strengthening its international intelligence system. The ministries have also directed the authorities concerned to prepare a list of expert officers in this regard.

The United States will set up a joint intelligence system of its three intelligence agencies in the Indian cities of New Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, and Jaipur. In addition, the Israeli intelligence agency will set up its offices in New Delhi, Mumbai, and Jammu. India will set up its joint intelligence offices in Washington and New York as well as in Israeli cities of Tel Aviv and Ashdod.

Agreement of Cooperation
The sources say that Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), Mosad, and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) have signed an agreement of cooperation spanning more than five years after long and intense deliberations of one year.

Supposedly, the United States has hatched a plan of bringing forward India to maintain its supremacy in the Afghan region, while Israel has also signed several joint intelligence-related agreements with India to increase its influence in the Arab countries through New Delhi.

Pakistan's Antics Against India as Attempts To Cover Up Failures

Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik has once again made a mockery of India by saying that the Indian intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) is extending support to terrorist activities in Pakistan. He added: "We are investigating into the role of this intelligence agency into creating unrest in Baluchistan."
A few months ago when Pakistan leveled such an allegation, India commented in the October 2009 editorial that Pakistan is trying to be smart by concealing its failure to foil the attempts by terrorist groups like the Taliban to spread violence in its territory. The discerning Pakistani public also is aware how their leadership is misleading them by indulging in falsehood.

Nefarious Aggressive Designs of Pakistan
There exists a general belief in India that "We wish we could retaliate nefarious aggressive designs of Pakistan then we would not have been subjected to terrorist violence spread across India." In fact, India faltered when it agreed to the incorporation of the reference to the Baluchistan issue in the joint statement issued by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani at Sharm-el Sheikh wherein it was stated that terrorism will not be included in the "composite dialogue with Pakistan." In this context, Manmohan Singh put forward the explanation, "how will Pakistan prove our involvement in Baluchistan when we are doing nothing there?"
Nevertheless, this provided an opportunity to Pakistan to level the charge against India. Malik even started saying that Pakistan is in possession of hard evidences of India's involvement in Baluchistan and the same can be produced before India at any forum. Notwithstanding all such claims, Pakistan has failed to bring them forward before India.

India's Non-Violence Approach
India is known for its history that even as it propagated its spiritualism and knowledge through saints and sages. Yet, it never mounted any military offensive in any part of the world. On contrary, the monarchs of India have been such that King Ashoka, extremely distressed over widespread bloodshed in the battle of Kalinga, abandoned the sword and adopted the path of non-violence by embracing Buddhism.
Prithviraj Chauhan pardoned Muhammad Ghori who invaded India 17 times and paid the penalty for his forgiveness when he was defeated in Ghori's 18th invasion. He was taken captive and his eyes were extracted. The Mughals invaded India and they settled here. In 1947, when Pakistan attacked Kashmir and when the Indian forces marched forward by pushing back Pakistan, Jawaharlal Nehru, showing magnanimity, affected the cease-fire and took the issue to the United Nations. As a consequence, one-third of Kashmir remained under illegal occupation of Pakistan.
In 1971, Indira Gandhi, exhibiting large heartedness and a sense of pardon, released 90,000 Pakistani troops captured by India. She displayed this quality of forgiveness when at the Shimla Conference Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto made entreaties to her saying, "With what face I will go before the Pakistanis empty handed."
Atal Behari Vajpayee also, in the wake of terrorist attack on Parliament, declared to go for a "do or die" war. Diplomatic relations with Pakistan were severed, air, road, and rail services were suspended, but later forces were withdrawn from the border. Exhibiting magnanimity, after some time all these services that remained suspended were resumed ultimately. In the name of "Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai" slogan, China grabbed 60,000 sq. mile territory of India. Even now it indulged in incursions along the Indian border. We are promoting trade ties with it, but failed to regain our territory.
In so far as the intelligence agencies is concerned, they failed to give advance input to the government with regard to terrorist attacks on the Jammu and Kashmir legislative assembly, nor for that matter Parliament. They could not gather advance information regarding terrorist attacks on Delhi and Mumbai either. Had our successive governments and the intelligence agencies the potential to carry out any kind of aggressive action we would have long ago resolved the Kashmir problem and wiped out terrorist training camps being run in Pakistan.
The Pakistani prime minister and the interior minister are deliberately terming India valiant. But, notwithstanding all this, if Pakistan is doing so in order to cover up its failures, then India also is helpless.
Nonetheless, such statements must delight the Indian Government and those RAW officials who are being awarded such a big certificate of creating unrest and disturbance in Pakistan even after their actually doing nothing in that country.

Indian Intervention in Balochistan

Is the US now planning to carry out drone attacks on Balochistan, much like it has done in Waziristan and other agencies of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA)? Will the Taliban Shura - whose chief is said to be Mullah Mohammad Omar, who, according to the US and Indian propaganda, has taken refuge in Quetta - be the target for these possible attacks? Have India's activities and shenanigans in Balochistan increased from earlier on? Are the Indian agents being employed in Balochistan becoming the US' ears in regards to the Taliban Shura?

These are the questions that face Pakistan, and that have overwhelmed it. Prominent US newspaper The Washington Post wrote on September 30, 2009: 'The Taliban Shura in Quetta and the surrounding areas are planning attacks on American and NATO forces in Afghanistan'. Pakistan has strongly denied this, but the US ambassador stationed in Islamabad, Anne Patterson, said in an interview: 'We are worried over the presence of the Taliban Shura in Quetta. We have in the past had our focus centered on Al-Qaeda, but for Washington, the Taliban Shura now heads the list'. So, is a new fight now coming to the fore in Balochistan?

Pakistanis are trying to steer clear of this fight, and it will only be best if the US avoids drone attacks in Balochistan. But the main question is: How can we be safe from Indian intervention and violent activities in Balochistan? If Pakistan is crying out on all forums in the world that India is interfering in Balochistan and backing rebellious elements there, it is certainly not being said in jest. There exists evidence, and this evidence is being presented by India and its eminent journalists, thinkers, former diplomats and military analysts. For instance, the article that former Indian diplomat M K Bhadrakumar wrote on September 6, 2006, immediately after Nawab Akbar Bugti's assassination, is both venomous in regards to Balochistan's domestic situation and a reflection of India's intervention and aspirations in Balochistan. Bhadrakumar wrote: 'Just like India wants to make (Occupied) Kashmir a part of itself at all costs, no matter how heavy the damages to life and property, Pakistan, similarly, wants to maintain its 'occupation' in Balochistan - no matter how much blood there has to be spilt'.

Prevailing Political Circumstances
This commentary is certainly provoking, though this former Indian diplomat knows very well that the political circumstances in Occupied Kashmir (Indian-administered Kashmir) and Balochistan are entirely different. Yet the said Indian Hindu deliberately steered clear of this reality and indulged in a wrong debate.

The following is not an accusation made against India for the sake of making one: that nearly 600 Baloch youth are being trained under Indian supervision in Afghanistan to carry out disrupting activities in Pakistan. Moles say that two wings of the Indian intelligence agency, Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), namely CIT-X and CIT-J are running the camps for the above-mentioned Baloch youth. Famous Indian military expert, Praveen Swami, says: 'When in the past Pakistan had shenanigans carried out in support of the Khalistanis in India, RAW had CIT-X and CIT-J carry out explosions in Karachi and Lahore, in reply. These wings of RAW were shut down in the tenure of I K Gujral, but both may now be employed again to teach Pakistan a lesson'.

B Raman has added to these comments by Swami - and this is actually an intimation of the fact that India may have certain 'motives' for intervention in Balochistan, and that these are impliedly being admitted to. B Raman is a former RAW agent and now a prominent defense analyst. He says: 'There has been a significant decrease in the number of Hindus in Balochistan. This is an outright cruelty and an act of seclusion against them by the Establishment of Pakistan. During the construction of the port at Gwadar, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) had forcefully removed the Balochi Hindus from there. India is quite distressed about such measures by Pakistan against the Balochi Hindus'.

If we read this provoking statement by a former agent of the Indian secret agency together with the statement of former Indian Navy Chief, Admiral Sureesh Mehta, it clearly opens up the layers to India's intervention in India. He was serving as chief of the Indian Navy when Mehta on January 24, 2008, said: 'The Gwadar Port has a strong adverse impact on India's strategic matters'.

A crushing and effective reply should have been given to this, but former President Pervez Musharraf and his supporters stayed mum. Such criminal silence can indeed be expected from a head of a state and a­ (former) head of the Pakistan Army who, for the sake of his own interests, becomes India's panhandler.

Every body knows that the Indians are behind whatever is being said against Pakistan in the name of a 'Baloch voice' and about the 'independence of Balochistan', over the past more than half a decade. But it is upsetting to see that Pervez Musharraf and Shaukat Aziz, as president and prime minister respectively, could not only not put a stopper to this voice from India, but could not raise their own voices against India either.

Independence of Balochistan
The centers under Indian supervision in Afghanistan called 'Missions in Pakistan', which prepare and distribute literature on Balochistan, are another tragic subject. It is the effect of this very literature and Indian intervention that made Nawabzada Brahmdagh say during a discussion with BBC on August 26, 2009: 'If India helps us in the independence of Balochistan, we shall accept'. It should be noted that there are 31 cases against Brahmdagh Bugti - ranging from murder to treason. Pakistan is fully assured that this mister is acting against Pakistan with all sorts of help provided by India.

It seems as if India is deliberately - and for the attainment of some greater goal -provoking its thinkers to spend all their energies in the form of the written word, so that the people of Balochistan may become wary of Pakistan and be inflamed against it. The case of Dr Ajay Sahni can be presented as an example. Ajay Sahni resides in Delhi and is an Executive Director of the Institute for Conflict (Management) and editor of the Asia Intelligence Review. He has in his comprehensive article, 'Is Pakistan Overhyping India's Role in Baluchistan' - which was published in The Times of India - resorted to a weird sort of instigation against Pakistan as regards Balochistan. He says: 'More than a million people were brought in from other provinces and settled in Balochistan so that the Baloch may be beaten on the basis of population. India, being a democratic and civilized country, can absolutely not remain isolated from whatever cruelties are happening to the Baloch in Balochistan'. This is the opinion of an Indian thinker, which in fact could be termed the Indian government's aspirations in relation to Balochistan.

Part of Joint Statement
When there was a meeting between Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani and his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh in Sharm el-Sheikh (Egypt) on July 16, 2009, Gilani, considering it an appropriate opportunity, mentioned the Indian intervention in Balochistan, which was then also made a part of their joint statement. This was like a great diplomatic victory for Pakistan, to which there was great reaction in India. An as extremist and fundamentalist a Hindu party as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) protested against the prime minister in the Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha. The prime minister even rescinded from his statement under pressure. A statement by Manmohan Singh in this regard was thus published on July 30, 2009: 'When I spoke to Prime Minister Gilani about terrorism from Pakistan, he told me that most Pakistanis believe that India is aggravating matters in Balochistan. I told him that we have no interest in destabilizing Pakistan. If Pakistan has evidence in this regard, we would like to see it'.

India's rescindments are known to the whole world, what difference does another one make. But the commentary that Sandeep Pandey - peace activist and prominent thinker - made on this statement in India is noteworthy too. Pandey said: 'Prime Minister Singh has in his (said) statement nearly admitted to what every Pakistani is mentioning (Indian intervention in Balochistan)'.

Whither Obama Promises to Islamic World?

That night of 20 January was the night to dream with open eyes, when the son of a black Muslim was seen in the historical function to take oath as the 44th President of the United States. That moment for the black US people was the realization of their dreams. However, the black and Muslim people of the entire world started having a new dream from that day. That dream was about good United States.
Now a question mark is being observed on the performance of Barack Obama after eight months and it is not asking from a single individual, rather from the history as to "what happened to that dream?" That dream, which faded out as soon as it was dreamt. Now ash of that dream is flying hither and thither in the shape of speeches on the global stage and its script writer is the US establishment.

Freedom of Palestine
Intellectuals of the world agreed on it that Obama would do nothing. However, there was a hope that the United States would correct its mistakes in the shape of Obama and would let the world win peace and freedom without which the word "civilization" is meaningless. However, the violence gripped this world after the break up of the Soviet Union and disintegration of the socialist block.
The nations of the world, which sacrificed three or four generations for freedom, their goal of freedom seemed a mirage to them. What is the answer the United States of Obama to this question as "what has happened to the freedom of Palestine?" Now Palestinians are not launching suicide attacks on the Jews and they are no more hijacking aircrafts. Why are they still under barbaric besiege of Israel?

Occupation of Iraq and Withdrawal from Afghanistan
The United States had a great opportunity in the shape of Obama to seek apology for the occupation of Iraq and to withdraw from Afghanistan. If it had sought guarantees from Islamic countries to do this, it would have obtained. However, it wasted the opportunity. Now the withdrawal of the United States from Afghanistan would be nothing more than a retreat. The reason is that it has been decided that the United States cannot stay in Afghanistan for long. It has to leave it. It would have been a lot better, if it had left it with honor.
As far as the prosperity of the world is concerned, people are leading life worse than before. All books of the capitalist world have turned into a heap of garbage, which described that the world once out of the threat of communism would become a paradise. Now communism is no more a threat. However, the world has become worse than before. Promises the United States pledged to the international community and the countries standing by it against the Soviet Union have not been honored. Pakistan is a sorrowful example of those broken promises. India supported the Soviet Union during the Cold War era. It did not support NATO countries. India did not support the United States or its allies from Afghanistan to Africa.

Bonhomie with India
However, the United States started bonhomie with India after the elimination of the Soviet Union and pushed Pakistan aside. India conducted nuclear tests and Pakistan paid it back in the same coin. However, both were subjected to sanctions. Then this shameful discrimination was exercised that the United States signed nuclear pact with India and announced that Pakistan should not expect such pacts. The United States used to request Pakistan for help during the Cold War era.
However, it started issuing aggressive threats in order to use Pakistan for its interests after the Cold War was over. Pakistan was subjected to discriminatory treatment regarding nuclear cooperation when Pakistan was either killing its friends of cold war era or it was handing them over to the United States, although they did not pose any threat to Pakistan. However, those best friends of Pakistan turned into the worst enemies because of the United States. Pakistan now stands alone in the war on terror, in which it was forcibly pushed into by the United States.
The United States is violating the sanctity of the Pakistani frontiers with its drone spy planes and the Indian intelligence agency, Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) has set up a large network in Afghanistan because of the United States. It has launched every kind of activities against Pakistan under the cover of aid to Afghanistan. The United States knows all this. Now its allies are also acknowledging this fact that India is using Afghan soil against Pakistan. However, the United States is calmly looking at this drama and doing nothing in this regard. If it is doing something, it is adding insult to Pakistan's injuries and that too with the US brand name. How is the United States playing its role in this regard?
The United States should realize this that the history of world does not stop. However, it happens that its pace is decreased through force, but its total stoppage is impossible. The anger against the United States is mounting and if the countries of the world do not form a front against the United States, people of the world could gather on a platform against the United States. The history is changed through the public role. If the countries of world do not devise policies to reflect the aspirations of the concerned public, the common people would come forward to play its role and the world would enter into a good and new era. The establishment of the world makes people subjugate the common people through technology. It exploits them.
However, the common people use the same technology to benefit them and the world establishment is rather flabbergasted over it. Now the anger in the entire world is emerging against the United States in a new way. The public realized the United States would change with the arrival of Obama. However, the common people are feeling sorry over its simplicity and innocence, which is transforming into revenge. The people of the world are feeling humiliated. A fire of revenge is burning in their hearts against the United States. The United States should fear this fire. It is the fire of the public, which has the courage and ability to change the history.
It is being proved from the recent statements of President Obama that white Bush is speaking in the guise of black president. He is still presenting Pakistan as Al-Qa'ida sanctuary. The United States is increasing the number of its troops in Afghanistan along with the number of drones that strikes missiles on the Pakistani borders. This drama is being staged during the government about which the US stand is that "We are strengthening democracy in the world."

Drone Attacks in Pakistan
Will drone attacks strengthen democracy in Pakistan? The difference between the United States of Obama and the United States of Bush, which emerged in the minds of people of the world ends when the dictator of the same (Pakistan) country visits the United States like a royal guest and holds political talks with George W. Bush.
The people of world would soon be disappointed from the change, which they attached to that US realization declaring Obama continuance of Bush. The important question in this regard is: Will the United States be able to bear the reaction of the disappointment of the people of the world?