Friday, March 1, 2013
Union Budget 2013-14: Focuses on Economic Growth, Middle Class To Pay More
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Economic Survey 2012-13: Reflects India's Grim Reality, Cautions Against Growing Taxes
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Economic Survey 2011-12: Inflation Pegged at 6.5 Per Cent, Maintained GDP Growth at 6.9 Per Cent
Inflation Rate
The Survey pegged inflation at 6.5-7 percent by end of March and projected a further moderation in the next fiscal. Inflation in the current fiscal has largely been driven by high food prices. It had slipped to a low of 6.6 percent in January, but rebounded to almost 7 percent in February. The survey, however, said that fiscal consolidation was the only way to keep inflation down.
The survey said that monetary measures by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and its impact on curbing inflation needed to be studied further to improve efficiency of such actions in the future. Incidentally, the RBI in its mid-quarter review of the monetary policy left key rates unchanged, citing upside risks to inflation.
Growth Rate
The Economic Survey has maintained Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth at 6.9 per cent. The growth in the financial year 2012-13 growth is expected to come in at 7.6 per cent and the financial year 2013-14 growth is pegged at 8.6 per cent.
Indian along with Indonesia showed strong growth despite a global economic slowdown in the final quarter of 2011, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
IMF in its latest provisional report has said the GDP growth of G20 – a grouping of leading economies of the world – slowed to 0.7 per cent in the October-December quarter, compared with 0.9 per cent in the third quarter.
In the United States, GDP growth increased to 0.7 per cent in the fourth quarter, compared with 0.5 per cent in third quarter.
The IMF stated that in India and Indonesia growth increased strongly, but slowed in China to 2 per cent, compared with 2. 3 per cent in the third quarter.
In Japan, economic growth decreased to (-)0.2 per cent, following the strong rebound (+1. 7 per cent) in third quarter.
The Survey states that GDP fell by (-)0.3 per cent in both the European Union and the euro area in the fourth quarter of 2011, the first fall since the second quarter of 2009.
Fiscal Deficit
The Survey states that the fiscal outcome in 2011-12 is likely to be affected by the macroeconomic setting which indicates sharp slowdown in industry and rising costs affecting profits. In the first nine months of the current fiscal, gross tax revenue has grown by 12.2 per cent as against the budget estimate target of 17.3 per cent, it said.
On the other hand, as against a target of 4.9 per cent for the whole year, growth in total expenditure in the first nine months of 2011-12 was 13.9 per cent, which comprised 15.4 per cent growth in non-Plan expenditure and 10.8 per cent growth in Plan expenditure, the survey added.
Per Capita Income
According to the Survey, the per capita income of India stood at $ 1,527 in 2011. The Survey says that this is perhaps the most visible challenge. Nevertheless, India has a diverse set of factors, domestic as well as external that could drive growth well into the future.
The Survey further says that between 1980 and 2010, India achieved a growth of 6.2 per cent, while the world as a whole registered a growth rate of 3.3 per cent. As a result, India’s share in global GDP more than doubled from 2.5 per cent in 1980 to 5.5 per cent in 2010.
Consequently, India’s rank in per capita GDP showed an improvement from 117 in 1990 to 101 in 2000 and further to 94 in 2009. China, however, improved its rank from 127 to 74 during the same period.
Highlights
* India's economic growth estimated at 6.9 per cent in the current fiscal; growth momentum to pick up in next two fiscals to 7.6 per cent 2012-13 and 8.6 per cent in 2013-14.
* RBI expected to lower policy interest rates, as inflationary pressures expected to ease in coming months; A low interest rate regime to encourage investment activity and push forward economic growth.
* Steps required for deepening of domestic financial markets, especially corporate bond market and attracting longer-term inflows from abroad; Efforts at attracting dedicated infrastructure funds have begun.
* The growth rate of investment in the economy is estimated to have declined significantly; borrowing costs up due to a sharp increase in interest rates.
* High borrowing costs and increase in other costs affecting profitability and internal accruals.
* Slowdown in Indian economy largely due to global factors, as also because of domestic factors like tightening of monetary policy, high inflation and slower investment and industrial activities.
* Inflation high, but showing clear signs of slowdown by the year-end; Whole-sale food inflation down to 1.6 per cent in January 2012 from 20.2 per cent in February 2010.
* India remains one of the fastest growing economies of the world; Country's sovereign credit rating rose by a substantial 2.98 per cent 2007-12
* Farm sector growth pegged at 2.5 percent for 2011-12.
* Services sector to grow at 9.4 percent.
* Services sector share in GDP to go up to 59 percent in the fiscal ending March 31.
* Industrial growth pegged at 4-5 percent, expected to improve as economic recovery resumes.
* Inflation on Wholesale Price Index (WPI) was high but showed clear slow down by the year-end. This is likely to spur investment activities leading to positive impact on growth.
* WPI food inflation dropped from 20.2 percent in February 2010 to 1.6 percent in January 2012.
* Calibrated steps initiated to rein-in inflation on top priority.
* India remains among the fastest growing economies of the world.
* Fiscal consolidation on track - savings and capital formation expected to rise.
* Exports grew by 40.5 percent in the first half of this fiscal and imports grew by 30.4 percent.
* Foreign trade performance to remain a key driver of growth.
* Forex reserves enhanced - covering nearly the entire external debt stock.
* Central spending on social services goes up to 18.5 percent this fiscal from 13.4 percent in 2006-07.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
China Reiterates Decision To Retain Autonomy in Currency Policy
China's Assistant Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao sent out a clear message about the direction of the Chinese currency Renminbi (RMB) reform direction and time frame. He also reduced observers and outsiders' expectation about the discussion of RMB exchange rate in the coming week's second round of Sino-US Strategic and Economic Dialogue to be held in Beijing. Zhu Guangyao has provided a realistic market view about the possibility of the appreciation of RMB situation in the days to come.
Currency Reform Measure
Citing Chinese national leaders' earlier remarks of upgrading China's currency exchange mechanism to 'acts of national sovereignty level', China's Assistant Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao told the press that 'China's specific reform measure has to be based on the change and development in the overall world economic situation. The Chinese Government will take independent coordination to consider and to push forward currency reform measure.'
'What I want to specifically emphasize is that China will not advance its currency reform in particularly when China is under external pressure. External pressure and noise will do nothing but slow our currency reform process.' Minister Zhu's statements echoed China's Prime Minister Wen Jiabao's warning two months ago when the latter said that putting pressure on China and forcing China to revaluate and appreciate RMB would be counter-productive.
The second round of China-US Strategic and Economic Dialogue will be held in Bejing beginning 24 May. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the US Secretary of Treasury Timothy Geithner will lead the US delegation to this year's high level bilateral dialogue with China. China will be represented by China's Vice Prime Minister Wang Qishan and China's State Councilor Dai Bingguo.
From the beginning of this year until today, a series of trade and strategic issues exacerbated tensions between China and the United States. The coming Dialogue should provide an opportunity for both nations to address these tension issues.
Based on China's Assistant Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao 's introduction, this Second China-US Strategic and Economic Dialogue, co-chaired by Wang Qishan and Timothy Geithner, will discuss the European sovereign debt crisis and its impact on the world economy in order to promote sustainable international fiscal policy; to build an open investment environment; to promote open trade in order to further deepen the reform of international financial institutions; among other related issues.
There are indications to show that at this Second China-US Strategic and Economic Dialogue, in the light of both countries' concern about the present European sovereign debt crisis and the worsening investment climate for Chinese enterprises in Europe, China's RMB issue will not be considered by both countries as a major issue as focus of attention at the Dialogue. At this moment, what we understand is that as far as China's currency exchange rate is concerned, the consensus between China and the US is to deal with this delicate issue in a low profile manner.
China-US Sensitive Issues To Adopt 'Quiet Communication' Strategy
Minister Zhu Guangyao also confirmed that although the RMB exchange rate would be one of the agenda in the Second China-US Strategic and Economic Dialogue, he also said that 'as the overall Sino-US economic relationship, the RMB exchange rate issue is only one of the issues. He said: 'This (exchange rate) is only one of the issues among the many issues in China-US bilateral economic issues. On sensitive bi-lateral economic issues, China and the United States should maintain 'quiet' communication.'
He also said: 'For sensitive issue such as the currency exchange rate, we hope both countries can keep the agreed upon spirit of 'quiet' strategy to engage in communication and dialogue. This should allow the views from both sides to be able to express fully so as to allow both countries to have deeper understanding on the same issue. This should help to push forward and promote the bilateral cooperation in macroeconomic policies between the two countries.'
All along, on resistance of foreign intervention on China's RMB exchange rate, the Chinese Government's policy has adopted the policy to deal with the issue in accordance with the 'autonomy, gradual and controllable' principle. However, from the US perspective, after the US Treasury suffered political pressure coming from the Congress to pressure China on appreciation of RMB, the US Treasury has delayed in submitting its semi-annual currency report to the US Congress since last month. As such, to the United States, the RMB exchange issue is still an outstanding issue for the US Government. However, market analysts have predicted that even without pressure coming from foreign countries, China's RMB will have a minor adjustment to appreciate from between 3 percent to 5 percent this year.
In Europe, the recent Euro crisis caused by the national debt crisis in Greece has led to many observers to opine that China may delay the measure to allow its RMB decoupling with US dollar. Substantial depreciation of the euro this year has led to the RMB exchange rate against the euro to appreciate more than 15 percent. To the Chinese enterprises that rely heavily on the current RMB exchange rate to maintain their market competitiveness, such development in Europe has resulted in significant export costing pressure to China's enterprises. As such since Europe is China's largest export market, the economic growth prospect of the European Union has also caused grave concern to the Chinese government officials.
European Sovereign Debt Crisis
Zhu Guangyao said: 'I hope that the main currency used as major monetary reserve can maintain a basic stability.' Zhu's remarks further implied that the dollar peg of the RMB exchange rate is unlikely to change.
As for the measure to cope with the European sovereign debt crisis, Zhu Guangyao pointed out that: 'Countries including China and the United States should strengthen coordination of macroeconomic policies. Both nations should make the G20 mechanism to become the main platform to play the actual role of governance on world economy. This can strengthen the international community's capacity to respond to this kind of economic crisis and challenge.'
Fiscal Deficit-GDP Ratio
Under the larger backdrop of possible expansion of sovereign debt crisis, Zhu Guangyao acknowledged that China is concerned about the growing US federal budget deficit.
He said: 'We hope that the US fiscal deficit-Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio can gradually be reduced in its economic recovery process to attain a sustainable level.'
China is now the largest holder of the US Treasury bonds. According to the US Treasury Department's international capital flows report released on 17 May, for the month of March the China's holdings of US Treasury bonds has increased US$17.7 billion dollars (approximately $24.5 billion), making the total China's holding of US Treasury bonds reaching $895.2 billion dollars. This was the first time China purchased US Treasury bonds since September 2009.
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Pakistani Economy in IMF Perspective
Growth Rate
At present, debt to be paid by Pakistan has increased manifolds, and Pakistan has to spend a lot of its foreign exchange in payment of loan installments and interest on it and debt servicing has become a serious issue for Pakistan. According to a recent policy statement by Finance Ministry, released in parliament, the total value of Pakistan's debt is 58.1 percent of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). According to Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation Act, the total value of Pakistan's debt, shouldn't exceed 60 percent of its GDP, in any case. Presently, the value of internal and external debt of Pakistan is close to the highest level. This is an alarming situation. The government should take effective measures for increase in tax revenue, in order to decrease its dependency on external debt.
It has further been mentioned in the statement of Finance Ministry, that value of debt has reached 8100 billion rupees, in the fist quarter of 2009-10, and a loan of 495 billion was taken in this period. Reasons of this are, delay in release of coalition support fund by the United States, marked devaluation of Pakistani rupee and decrease to lowest level of tax GDP ratio. Pakistan's debt has increased rapidly, during the last two years.
Debt Burden
According to report of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Pakistan's debt will further increase in next five years. In order to lessen pressure on local currency due to increasing debt of Pakistan and bleak situation of balance of external payments, it is being apprehended that Pakistan's economy will entangle again in the vicious circle of loans, when new loans will be needed for payment of service charges of previous loans. But according to some economic experts, Pakistan's debt is still within bearable level as per GDP ratio.
According to IMF figures, Pakistan's external debt will touch 57.1 billion dollar mark, by the end of this year. There will be an increase of 12.3 percent (7 billion dollars) in next year and external debt will reach the value of 64 billion dollars, while in 2015-16, volume of our external debt will be 72.6 billion dollars. Increase in Pakistan's debt is mainly due to increasing deficits of fiscal and current payments.
The Government is compelled to take more internal and external loans to fill these gaps. Between 2000 and 2007, average deficits of fiscal and current payments were 3.8 percent and 0.7 percent respectively, and external debt was reduced to 28.1 percent of GDP, but value of external debt was 40 billion dollars and foreign exchange reserves were 16.4 billion dollars, but in 20007-08 the external debt increased to 30.4 percent of GDP.
Foreign Exchange Reserves
There was a sharp increase in oil and commodity prices during 2008.Foreign investment shrunk and foreign exchange reserves started eroding and in a few months reduced to 4 billion dollars, while rupee was devalued more than 25 percent. Fiscal and current payment deficits started increasing sharply. Previous government, due to vested interests, didn't pass on the increase in oil and commodity prices to the consumers and stability of economy was put at stake. In order to stabilize the economy, government took 7.6 billion dollar loan from IMF in July 2009.
There was sharp increase in external debt during the last two years and an increase of 20 billion is expected in next five years. According to IMF observation, Pakistan will not face any difficulty in payment of service charges of external debt. In 2010-11, external debt will be 34.1 percent of GDP, after that it will start falling and will reduce to just 31 percent in 2015-16.
Yearly increase in external debt, basically, is due to availability of scheduled loans of IMF and payments. External debt will start stabilizing, when government will pay the standby loan of IMF. Pakistan will not spend more that 2 billion dollars per year in next five years, on service charges of these IMF loans, because loans taken from other sources are long term and on concessional rates. If exports are frozen and economy doesn't show significant growth, then external debt can cross the bearable limits.
Minimizing Fiscal Deficit
Our basic problem is that, from day one, we are spending more than our income. Neither did our rulers take any serious measures to increase the revenue of government, nor did they formulate any strategy to control non developmental expense. Incumbent government is towing the same line, as the previous government.
Neither has it been able to impose tax on agriculture nor has it been able to convince the resourceful and powerful businessmen and industrialists to pay taxes honestly. Instead government cuts the development expense to minimize the fiscal deficit, resulting in negative impact on efforts for development of social and economic infrastructure and increase in poverty and unemployment.
It is important that government should review its income and expense policies on emergency basis and bring in the tax net, all sectors of economy, abolishing all tax exemptions and nondevelopmental expense should also be reduced. If exports are frozen, government fails to control the slowing economy and private investment doesn't take place in economic sectors, then there will always be a chance of external debt crossing the tolerable limits.
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Pranab Mukherjee's General Budget
There was a general opinion that the government may withdraw stimulus packages. Even the Economic Survey, 2009-10 had hinted at the same. Yet, avoiding withdrawal of the package immediately, there is a proposal to withdraw these packages gradually and slowly. This made the industrialist community heave a sigh of relief.
Education Sector
By allotting Rs.310.36 billion for school education, the government has taken a step toward reform in primary and secondary education providing free education. Yet, there is no hint whatever at reining in the institutions of higher learnings and private technical and training institutions which charge exorbitant fees. Reining in these institutions to bring down their fee structure is extremely necessary to enable the common man to aspire for high education.
By increasing the allocation by 75 percent for urban development it has been pegged Rs.54 billion. Though, a mention has been made to improve infrastructure in urban and rural sectors and a huge amount of Rs.1.735 trillion has been earmarked yet, the government appears to be inclined more toward urban development. The government has stressed the need of paying attention to public expenditure and providing resources yet, there is no mention whatsoever of any concrete measure for the same.
Step Toward Privatization
The announcement of earning Rs.250 billion through disinvestments, is yet another step toward privatization. Yet, one wonders how the government would deal with issues like employment of those working in this sector and other issues. Empirically speaking, earlier experience of the government in this regard has not been much successful. Yet the decision to provide services to the economically weaker sections of the society is an appropriate one.
It is only for conjecture how far would the initiatives taken toward power and energy sector be successful and effective, because despite best efforts of the government in this sector, there has been no worthwhile improvement and the progress has been rather slow. The finance minister also made a mention of initiation of measures to check inflation and price rise. Yet, until concrete results of such announcement are visible, it is difficult to appreciate them.
Revamping of Income Tax Slabs
The most significant and entirely unexpected decision in the budget is the revamping of income tax slabs, which aims at providing relief to the middle class. Under the new slab, structure, those earning up to Rs.500,000 a year would pay income tax at the rate of 10 percent, earlier it was 20 percent. The decision would provide relief to 60 percent of taxpayers. However, the common man has been further burdened by the increases in the prices of diesel and petrol.
It would have its impact on public transport and freight section. This would nullify the measures the government's efforts in chocking price rise and may further escalate prices of essential commodities and consumer goods. It was however, already expected by the people. On the whole, the budget proposals, if not laudable, contain some good decisions, which were not being expected of the government.
Highlights of Budget
* Basic duty of 5percent on crude oil restored
* Tax on cigarettes, cigars and chewing tobacco up
* Rs 26,000 crore revenue loss due to cut in direct taxes
* Partial roll back of reduction in central excise duty
* IT returns forms for individual tax payers to be further simplified
* Expenditure in 2010-11 estimated at 11,l8,749 crore
* Fiscal deficit estimated at 5.5 percent in 2010-11; 1 percent improvement over 2009-10
* 46 percent of plan allocations in 2010-11 will be for infra
* Implementation of direct tax code from April 2011
* FDI flows in April-Dec 2009 $20.9 billion
* National Social Security Fund created for workers in unorganized sector
* National Clean Energy Fund to be established
* Exclusive skill development program for textile sector
* Banking facilities to be provided to all habitations with a population of 2,000 and more
* New fertilizer policy from April 2010
* Toy balloons, water filters, refrigerators, mobile equipment, set top boxes, CDs cheaper
Saturday, July 4, 2009
Economic Survey (2008-09)
The pre-budget Economic Survey for 2008-09 presented in the Parliament India’s economic growth may accelerate to about seven per cent this year provided there is a normal monsoon and the government undertakes sweeping reforms like abolition of fuel subsidies and expansion of infrastructure.
Growth Rate and Inflation
The speed at which the country’s economy would return to a high growth trajectory in the short term also depends on a revival of the global economy, particularly the US economy, the survey stated. India should be back on the path of 8.5 percent to 9 percent growth per annum provided policy and institutional bottlenecks are removed, it added.
The survey, prepared by the finance ministry, also said inflation was no longer a worry and called for an urgent return to the targeted fiscal deficit of three percent. The deficit grew to 6.2 percent in 2008-09 as the Government unleashed stimulus spending to insulate the economy against the global meltdown. The survey also called for offloading equity in public sector undertakings, reform of fertilizer and food subsidies and auction of third-generation cellular phone spectrum.
The survey said the government should take advantage of the recent low price in oil costs to deregulate petrol and diesel prices. It also urged it improve the investment climate including hiking the foreign investment cap in insurance to 49 percent from 26 percent. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multibrand retail should be allowed, starting with food retailing, and price controls on sugar and fertilizers should be removed, the survey noted.
Manufacturing: The survey said the size of the Indian market and the unmet demand for industrial products provides reasonable hope that demand would not be a constraining factor. There is also a reasonable consensus that given the market situation, industry is unlikely to face a price deflation, it said.
It said manufacturing posted 2.4 percent growth in the last fiscal against 8.5 percent in the year-ago period. The pace of slowdown accelerated in the second half of 2008-09 with the sudden worsening of the global financial markets and a bleak economic outlook. With jobs getting lost by the thousands as a fallout of the downturn, the survey asked the government to review labour laws for pushing growth in employee-intensive sectors.
Exports: The Government should slash customs duties, streamline export promotion schemes and pay special attention to infrastructure to overcome the contracting exports on account of the ongoing recession faced by India’s major trading partners, the survey stated.
The survey stated that besides short-term relief measures and stimulus packages, some fundamental policy changes are also needed for the merchandise trade sector.
The survey called for “weeding out unnecessary customs duty exemptions” and rationalising the tax structure, including specific duties, in a calibrated manner, taking into account the specific duty levels prevailing in the trading partner countries.
Fiscal Deficit: The government should also assess the possibility of entirely eliminating fiscal deficit, but with flexibility that it could be widened at a time of economic slowdown, the survey suggested. It urged the government to review the possibility of zero fiscal deficit as part of Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) II.
Tax Reductions: Noting the country’s tax system continues to be complex, the survey asked the government to undertake further reforms including implementation of a uniform tax structure. It said the introduction of a Goods and Services Tax (GST) would be opportune for deepening the reforms process already underway. GST is scheduled to be implemented from April 1, 2010.
Public Sector Undertakings: Some of the suggestions in this year’s Survey are extremely sensible, such as subsidising kerosene only for non-LPG and non-electricity rural homes, ending leakage of subsidies, introducing a new income-tax code or phasing out a plethora of transaction taxes, surcharges and cesses.
The advice to rein in the burgeoning deficit and put the government back on the path of fiscal responsibility is laudable. To do this, the Survey suggests the government can get Rs 25,000 crores annually through disinvestments: offloading 10 per cent from unlisted PSUs after getting them listed, and auctioning off loss-making PSUs. It has also advised the Government to decontrol oil, fertiliser and drug prices in order to further stimulate the economy.
The biggest items of reform are the disinvestment proposals in the Survey. It suggests selling 5-10 per cent equity in identified profit-making non-Navratna PSUs, listing of all unlisted PSUs and selling of a minimum of 10 per cent equity to the public, auctioning of all loss-making PSUs that cannot be revived, and negative bidding in PSUs with zero net worth in the form of debt write-offs.
Assessment
The survey is critical of the way the oil price hike was handled, but it supports the politically sensitive issue of freeing the petrol and diesel prices from government control. It means consumers will pay global rates of oil and government subsidy will cease. The housewife will get only six to eight cylinders of subsidised cooking gas in a year and for the rest she will pay the market price. The sudden hike in the petrol and diesel prices on Wednesday has already shocked consumers and more such shocks are possible in future should the oil prices shoot up again.
Timely implementation of the projects is, therefore, essential to maintain their financial viability. Then there are policy and regulatory gaps, inadequate availability of long-term finance and inadequate capacity of the private sector. As part of the solution, the survey has called for establishing a regulatory authority for the transport sector covering the highways, railways, ports and airports.
The recommendations may not be fully reflected in the budget. Yet, its survey of the macroeconomy and its analysis indicate the direction in which government policy would be moving.
Highlights of Economic Survey
* Unleash reforms - phase out cesses, surcharges and transaction taxes (such as commodities transaction tax, securities transaction tax and Fringe Benefit Tax)
* Introduce new Income Tax Code that results in neutral corporate tax regime
* 7-7.5 percent growth possible in 2009-10
* Allow 49 percent FDI in defence and insurance; permit FDI in multi-format retail starting with food
* Proposes another round of fiscal stimulus including tax cuts and increase in expenditure
* Decontrol petrol and diesel prices; end Government monopoly in railways,
* coal and nuclear energy
* Lift all bans on future contracts to restore price discovery; decontrol sugar and fertiliser
* Revitalise disinvestment programme to generate Rs 25,000 crore annually, list all PSUs and auction those beyond revival
* Economic growth decelerated in 2008-09 to 6.7 per cent from nine per cent in 2007-08
* Fiscal deficit in 2008-09 shot up to over 6 per cent from 2.7 per cent in 2007-08
* Survey indicates FRBM-II to get back to path of fiscal consolidation
* Complete the process of selling 5-10 per cent equity in identified profit-making non-’Navratna’ PSUs
* List all unlisted PSUs and sell a minimum 10 per cent equity to public.
* Auction all loss-making PSUs that cannot be revived
* In PSUs with zero networth, allow negative bidding in the form of debt write-off
* Auction 3G spectrum
* The auctioned spectrum must be freely tradable, with capital gains on spectrum to be taxed under the Income Tax Act
* Rationalise Dividend Distribution Tax to ensure full single taxation of returns to capital in the hands of the receiver
* Reform petroleum (LPG, Kerosene), fertiliser and food subsidies to reduce leakages and ensure targeting
* Limit LPG subsidy to a maximum of 6-8 cylinders per annum per household
* Phase out kerosene supply-subsidy by ensuring that every rural household has a solar cooker and solar lantern
* Review customs duty exemptions and move to a uniform duty structure to eliminate inverted duties
* Implement GST from April 1, 2010
* Rapid operationalisation of UID Authority within 3 months
* Agriculture growth fell sharply to 1.6 per cent in 2008-09 from 4.9 per cent
* Exports grew at 3.4 per cent to 168 billion dollar in 2008-09 from 163 billion dollar in previous fiscal
* Imports grew at 14.3 per cent to $287.75 bn from $251.65 bn
* Trade balance deteriorated to $119.05 bn from $88.52 bn.